It is well known that the "piercing power" of the red beam is much greater than that of the purple beam. The first circumstance is self-explanatory. How do you explain that? Two important circumstances seem to stand out: a) astronauts look at the Earth through a thick layer of air, b) observation is carried out in conditions of weightlessness. Rumina, the vegetation looks from space - not green, but dark brown. It seems impossible: because the visual resolution is 1 arc minute and the car can be seen from a distance of 300 km at an angle of only a few seconds. Glazkov saw individual vehicles from space. Let's turn to the experience of astronauts.įor example, Yu. Gravity alters such a delicate mechanism as color perception. But if the magnetic field really does reduce the size of a person, do changes in gravity have no effect on our bodies? In recent years, it has become clear that they do. It turns out that it was maximal in the Middle Ages, minimal in the Neolithic. years the Kiev archaeologist Vasilik has shown that there is a strict inverse correlation between the size of the human skull and the size of this field. Based on the analysis of constructions for the last 10-12 thousand. What, then, influenced the growth of man?Ī new scientific discipline, archaeomagnetism, which has recently emerged, makes it possible to determine the strength and declination of the magnetic field in previous epochs using the magnetization of building material of ancient structures. Despite acceleration, our size is still far from the limit due to gravity. The specificity of the change in human growth does not seem to be accidental, but is related to changes in external factors. The recent gradual decline in growth has been replaced by the notorious acceleration. Many skeletons from Neolithic burials are more than 2 m long. Recall that the average human height has also changed over the past millennia.
![crimsonworld crimsonworld](https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/buddyfight/images/c/cf/H-SD01-0007EN.png)
It seems that ancient people perceived short-wave colors of the spectrum much worse than we do. Blue and blue are not differentiated in these languages.
![crimsonworld crimsonworld](https://picfiles.alphacoders.com/348/348263.jpg)
The same is evidenced by the specifics of modern European languages with ancient roots: English, French, Portuguese. "wine-colored." In the recent past, blue and green colors were referred to by one word in the Turkmen language. But then how do you explain that the ancient Jews and Chinese did not know the color blue? It is also absent from Homer's poetry: the sea is his. It begs the question: why did this happen? Not with the fact that ochre was the most popular paint with ancient artists - it was literally lying around underfoot? Or perhaps with the fact that the blue and purple paint on the "murals" has simply faded over time? If you look at the drawings of our ancestors it is easy to see: red-orange (long-wave, "warm") color scheme clearly prevails.